The Evolution of Talent Assessment Across Four Eras
In the specialized research titled "21st-Century Talent Spotting," Claudio Fernández-Aráoz provides a comprehensive framework for understanding how talent has been assessed and placed throughout history. This historical progression is categorized into four distinct eras, each defined by the primary attributes used to identify top contributors. In the early era of human industry, physical attributes served as the key differentiators for talent. As the global economy matured into the 20th century, the second era shifted focus toward logical and analytical abilities. By the latter part of the 20th century, the third era emerged, characterized by a shift toward competency, where specific skills were the primary measure of professional value.
We have now entered the fourth era, where potential must become the central focus of talent management. This transition is necessitated by the fact that the modern environment is volatile, uncertain, complex, and ambiguous, a state frequently referred to by the acronym VUCA. In such a rapidly changing climate, current competence alone cannot serve as a sufficient measure of long-term success. Instead, the potential to adapt and grow into complex roles and environments is the key ability that a CEO or executive management team of a firm should be assessed against. Because current job requirements can become obsolete almost overnight, organizations must look beyond what an individual can do today and prioritize what they are capable of learning to do tomorrow.
The Impending Global Talent Void and Pipeline Scarcity
The strategic focus on potential is further driven by an impending global talent void caused by three primary factors: globalization, demographics, and inadequate internal pipelines. Top talent will continue to become scarce as both emerging and mature markets compete for growth. While emerging markets provide the biggest potential for expansion, they are vying for the same limited pool of leaders as established mature markets. There is a specific, high-intensity search for young leaders between the ages of 35 and 44, yet demographic shifts indicate that by 2020, most countries will have a significant portion of their workforce exiting as they reach retirement age.
Beyond these external demographic pressures, many firms suffer from internal deficiencies, lacking the necessary pipeline to develop talent for critical roles in management. When these external and internal factors are combined, they create a systemic scarcity of talent that will impact organizations in the near future. To bridge this gap, managers must become exceptionally skilled at spotting raw potential rather than relying solely on established performance metrics or past experience.
The Egon Zehnder Model: Five Traits for Identifying Potential
To address the challenge of identifying individuals with the capacity to thrive in unknown future conditions, Claudio Fernández-Aráoz and his colleagues at Egon Zehnder, an executive research firm, developed a scientifically based model for assessing potential. This assessment process begins with a deep exploration of a candidate’s personal and professional history, complemented by open discussions and rigorous reference checks. The goal of this process is to identify five key traits that indicate high potential:
- Motivation: This is an unconscious quality characterized by a fierce commitment to excel while pursuing unselfish goals. High-potential individuals display a drive to achieve meaningful results for the organization rather than just personal gain.
- Curiosity: This trait involves a drive to proactively seek out new understanding and learning. Individuals with high curiosity are energized by change and are consistently open to new ideas and information.
- Insight: This is the ability to analyze a vast range of information and extrapolate from it to find new opportunities. It allows a leader to make sense of ambiguity and find creative paths forward in complex situations.
- Engagement: This involves the capacity to make deep personal connections and use both logic and emotion to drive a compelling vision. It is the ability to connect with others on a level that drives collective action and commitment.
- Determination: This trait is the resolve to pursue challenging tasks and deal with adversities head-on. It describes the resilience and grit required to stay the course when faced with significant obstacles.
These five traits are predictive in nature; they do not merely describe current levels of attainment but provide a window into how an individual’s specific competencies could develop in the future. By utilizing this model, organizations can ensure that talent promotion is based on a rigorous analysis of future capacity rather than being left to intuition or a simple review of past performance.
Retaining and Energizing High-Potential Talent
Identifying high-potential talent is only the first step; organizations must also take care of the talent they find. While financials and compensation play a role in employment, they are not the primary drivers for sustaining the motivation of top talent over the long term. Instead, three psychological factors are essential for keeping high-potential employees energized:
- Autonomy: Providing talent with the freedom to direct their own work and make meaningful decisions.
- Mastery: Creating opportunities for individuals to continuously improve their skills and reach higher levels of capability.
- Purpose: Ensuring that the work being done is connected to a larger, meaningful goal that transcends the immediate task.
Keeping key talent energized through these three factors will drive them to stay motivated and sustain their drive within the organization. When employees feel they have the independence to execute, the support to grow, and a reason to care, they are far more likely to remain loyal during the volatility of a VUCA world.
The New Employer-Employee Compact: Tours of Duty
From a practical perspective, managing the modern relationship between an organization and its talent requires a new framework, such as the one proposed in "Tours of duty: The new employer-employee compact" by Hoffman, Casnocha, and Yeh. To keep top talent, the authors suggest creating compacts rather than traditional long-term contracts. This model should be applied at any level of the organization rather than just focusing on senior management.
A core recommendation of this framework is the use of rotations every two years, a method often employed effectively by management consulting firms. This structure allows the employee to gain diverse operational experience across multiple areas while remaining within the same organization. Overall, this does not mean that competence, experience, and performance should be overlooked; rather, they should be viewed in unison with potential to create a holistic view of a leader’s value. By adopting these compacts, organizations can build a more resilient and adaptable leadership pipeline that survives the talent scarcity of the 21st century.
Ref: Hoffman, R., Casnocha, B., & Yeh, C. (2013). Tours of duty: The new employer-employee compact. Harvard Business Review, 91(6): 48-58. Retrieved from https://hbr.org/2013/06/tours-of-duty-the-new-employer-employee-compact
0 Comments